WPBSA has yesterday issued two statements, one regarding Robert Milkins, the other regarding Matthew Selt
WPBSA Statement – Robert Milkins
WPBSA Statement 14th July 2022
The WPBSA and Robert Milkins Disciplinary Hearing Finding
At a WPBSA Disciplinary Committee hearing before an independent tribunal on 9th June 2022, Robert Milkins accepted that he had breached the WPBSA Rules and his World Snooker Limited (WSL) Players Contract:
The facts of the case are that on Sunday 6th March 2022 after the opening ceremony for the inaugural 2022 Nirvana Turkish Masters, Milkins was very drunk and was involved in an altercation with guests at the Players Ceremony, attended by a number of high-profile dignitaries and event partners. He later fell and split his chin in the toilets and was taken to hospital where he had his stomach pumped.
This was damaging to the reputation of WST and his behaviour was unacceptable. It was found to be a breach of the WPBSA Members Rules and his WSL Players Contract in that this amounted to conduct unbecoming a sportsperson and brought the sport into disrepute.
At the hearing Milkins apologised for his actions having demonstrated significant remorse for the incident and confirmed that he had made personal apologies to both event partners and dignitaries.
On 4th July 2022, the sanction imposed on Milkins by the Disciplinary Committee was:
- To pay a fine of £6,000; and
- To pay the costs of the Hearing fixed at £1,000
The WPBSA Members Rules
1.1 Members shall, at all times (i.e. whether at a Tournament or not), behave in a proper and correct manner consistent with their status as professional sportsmen.
1.3 A Member shall not make or cause to be made any statement or commit or cause to be committed any act which in the reasonable view of the WPBSA is likely to bring into disrepute the games of snooker and/or billiards.
WSL Players Contract
3.5.1 Behave in a professional and reputable manner befitting a professional sportsperson.
3.1.6 Not to do anything that may damage the reputation and goodwill of the Snooker Parties and the Partners.
WPBSA Statement – Matthew Selt
WPBSA Statement 14th July 2022
The WPBSA and Matthew Selt Disciplinary Hearing Finding
At a WPBSA Disciplinary Committee hearing before an independent tribunal on 9th June 2022, Matthew Selt accepted that he had breached the WPBSA Rules and his players contract:
The allegation was that the Player had sent private messages in April 2022 to a member of the public that were considered to be abusive, insulting, upsetting and disrespectful. The messages were subsequently put into the public domain and then published in the media where they attracted adverse comment. The content of the messages were considered to be a breach of the WPBSA Members Rules and his World Snooker Limited Players Contract in that this amounted to conduct unbecoming a sportsperson and brought the sport into disrepute.
At the hearing Selt was deeply apologetic and regretted his actions.
On 14th June 2022, the sanction imposed on Selt was:
- To pay a fine of £2,000; and
- Be warned as to his future conduct to ensure no similar breaches occurred in the future; and
- To pay the costs of the Hearing fixed at £1,000
The WPBSA Members Rules
1.1 Members shall, at all times (i.e. whether at a Tournament or not), behave in a proper and correct manner consistent with their status as professional sportsmen.
1.3 A Member shall not make or cause to be made any statement or commit or cause to be committed any act which in the reasonable view of the WPBSA is likely to bring into disrepute the games of snooker and/or billiards.
WSL Players Contract
3.5.1 Behave in a professional and reputable manner befitting a professional sportsperson.
3.1.10 Treat all Snooker Parties, the public and any other people associated with WSL Events with respect and not communicate or behave in an abusive, insulting, disrespectful, racist, sexist, homophobic, intimidating, threatening or violent manner.
The above statement about Robert Milkins did trigger lots of comments of social media. Many fans believe that this is too harsh, and make comparisons with Liang Wenbo’s case.
I don’t think those cases are comparable.
Liang Wenbo is guilty of a crime in law. He was trialed before a Magistrate for it and was given a fine and 12 months of community service. He now has a criminal record. WPBSA “action” came after that, and on top of it. He didn’t break any contract rule, but his conduct brought the game in disrepute. He got a fine, a rather mild one, but was also suspended for four months. This suspension included the 2022 World Championship, by far the most lucrative tournament of the year. The loss of potential earnings and the impact on his ranking was/is certainly important and, in a way, they are an “indirect” fine too.
Robert Milkins’ conduct created a very serious incident at a tournament, an incident caused by excessive drinking. To make it worse it happened at the first tournament held in a “new” country, a “new” market, and let’s not forget that Turkey is a Muslim-majority country. Islam forbids alcohol consumption. It could have been very damaging for the future and promotion/sponsoring of snooker in Turkey and the middle-East. Therefore a hefty fine was justified. I’m certain that Robert Milkins, who is a fundamentally good person, is genuinely contrite and ashamed.
I’m a woman, I’m in no way excusing Liang Wenbo’s violence. I will however observe that we don’t know anything of the circumstances that lead to the incident. I have met Liang on multiple occasions and one thing I know about him is that he certainly has “anger management” issues. He is the “firecracker” in more ways than one. That’s no excuse, but it’s something that should be adressed. The sport prides itself over the support it offers to players suffering mental health issues. Mental healths issues come in many forms, it’s not just about depression. I would have loved to see Liang’s return to the sport being “conditional” to mandatory counselling.
I will also observe that many fans who are rightly appalled by Liang’s behaviour, find all sorts of excuses when it comes to Alex Higgins. Alex was a great snooker player, he did put snooker in the spotlight, he inspired many yougsters to pick up a cue, and he could be charming when he wanted to but, in my view, he was also a terrible, horrible human being: selfish, violent, manipulative and unrepentant. That’s an opinion I formed after reading his autobiographies, and Jason’s Francis book about how the “Snooker Legends” started. Alex was also a women beater. He smashed his girlfriend’s jaw with a hairdryer and he assaulted a prostitute too. He was banned from his sport on numerous occasions for threatening and aggressive behaviour as well. So people, maybe it’s time for some consistency … and, BTW, Alex issues with alcohol and gambling are no excuses for his wrongdoings: he never seriously tried to address them.
Hi Monique.
I grew up idolising Alex and have reluctantly had to accept that, yes, he was a bad influence.
But he did try on various occasions to address his drinking. He went into the 1979 World Championships sober, and played one of his best world championships (probably better than in 1982) – he was just unlucky to run into Terry Griffiths playing outstandingly well. He cut down on his drinking in 1983, and won the UK Championship in that phase (kind of – Rex Williams and Del Simmons got him to load up on the booze before the first evening session in the final). And he went on the wagon in 1989, winning the Irish Championship and Irish Masters.
Alex is often described as the best drunk player ever, but he was at his best when he was (more or less) sober… and I think, deep down, he wanted to be. At least his good side did.
None of which excuses his appalling behaviour.
Until you mentioned by Alex Higgins and the fans’ attitude about him I was happy that after all it is going to the right direction that people are more appalled by violence against women than a drunken embarrassment where Milkins physically only hurt himself and he tried to do as much damage control as possible. I personally certainly have sympathy for Milkins who apparently reacted very badly to whatever he drank. But Alex Higgins was terrible and no matter how great he played, I have no sympathy for the character.
On a different note the news about Selt is very cryptic. Is it known what he wrote and why?
I saw things on twitter. Not all of it. He got in a row with a fan and it turned ugly. As for Milkins, I know him quite well and he’s a good guy. I have sympathy for him too. However, given the circumstances – first time in Turkey and all – WPBSA had no choice but punish him with more than a slap on the wrist. Robert, I’m sure, is terribly ashamed of what happened and will be eager to redeem himself in every possible way.
In the meantime I remembered that Google is my friend and yes, Selt is full of it. And not worthy of attention.
Ive said for a long time if Steve Davis headbutted a TD in the 80s it would be seen as worst than Alex Higgins did it as was the case it was almost expected from Alex.
People Just did not expect it from Liang he was almost seen as the court jester with some of his antics and hearing he abused a woman was WOW.
Nothing justifies violence but with some people its more acceptable than others unfortunately.
It’s NEVER acceptable. The thing is, people have created a “legend” around Alex masking the fact that he wasn’t a nice person at all.
Its been accepted Alex did what Alex did so it wasn’t really a shock Alex was Infamous before turning pro and that’s unbelievable in 60s Snooker.
Its not acceptable far from it but at the same time it wasn’t a shock.